2023-24
Highlights
- Feedback from TPG respondents has been consistently positive (Figure 1).
- Gains compared to the previous administration were found in Enhancement of Leadership and Advocacy Skills and Dissertation / Capstone project / Practicum.
- Frequently mentioned concepts as the best aspects of the TPG experience included “practical”, “opportunities”, “people” and “knowledge” (Figure 2).


2022-23
Highlights
- Students have consistently rated Attainment of University Educational Aims, Teaching and Learning Environment, and Overall Satisfaction above four, from the 2020-21 administration onwards (Figure 1).
- Students perceived Teacher-student Relationships the most highly among all aspects, followed by Intellectual Inquiry and Personal and Professional Ethics.
- Frequently mentioned concepts as the best aspects of the TPG experience included “programme”, “professor” and “knowledge” (Figure 2).


2021-22
Highlights
- Student perceptions of Attainment of University Educational Aims, Teaching and Learning Environment, and Overall Satisfaction all reported scores of four or above on a five-point scale (Figure 1).
- As in previous years, the three highest ratings were on Knowledge and Skills, Relevance to Practice and Active Learning.
- Frequently mentioned as best aspects of the TPG experience were “learn”, “professional” and “perspective” (Figure 2).


2020-21
Highlights
- Overall performance on Achievement of Educational Aims, Teaching and Learning Environment, and Overall Satisfaction reached a higher record in the 2020-21 SLEQ-TPG after years of steady progression (Figure 1).
- The highest rating emerged on Knowledge and Skills gained from TPG programmes, closely followed by Relevance to Practice and Active Learning.
- From qualitative comments, many students frequently mentioned keywords such as “global perspectives”, “sharing”, and “professional” as the best aspects of their learning programmes (Figure 2).
Detailed results at the institutional, Faculty and curriculum levels are available at the online Institutional Survey Reports System (ISRS). Faculties could generate survey reports at various levels and make comparisons across years. All academic and administrative staff with access rights can directly access the system after logging onto their HKU Portal accounts (HKU Portal > Self Service > Teaching and Learning > Institutional Survey Reports > View Reports). Detailed instructions on using the System are available in the User Manual, downloadable here.
Faculties are welcome to contact Dr. Maggie Zhao at myzhao@hku.hk for support in interpreting and utilising survey data, and Ms. Yvonne Chan at chanyyw@hku.hk for technical support in using ISRS.


2019-20
Highlights
- Overall performance on Achievement of Educational Aims, Teaching and Learning Environment, and Overall Satisfaction has remained consistently positive over the years (Figure 1).
- The highest rating in the 2019-20 SLEQ-TPG was for Knowledge and Skills gained from TPG programmes, followed closely by Relevance to Practice and Teacher-Student Relationships.
- In students’ qualitative comments, keywords such as “professional”, “knowledge”, and “teachers” emerged as the best aspects of TPG programmes (Figure 2).
Detailed results at the institutional, Faculty and curriculum levels are available at the online Institutional Survey Reports System (ISRS). Faculties could generate survey reports at various levels and make comparisons across years. All academic and administrative staff with access rights can directly access the system after logging onto their HKU Portal accounts (HKU Portal > Self Service > Teaching and Learning > Institutional Survey Reports > View Reports). Detailed instructions on using the System are available in the User Manual, downloadable here.
Faculties are welcome to contact Dr. Maggie Zhao at myzhao@hku.hk for support in interpreting and utilising survey data, and Ms. Yvonne Chan at chanyyw@hku.hk for technical support in using ISRS.


2018-19
Highlights
- Overall performance on Achievement of Educational Aims, Teaching and Learning Environment, and Overall Satisfaction has remained consistently positive over the years (Figure 1).
- In 2018-19, taught postgraduate students rated the highest on Knowledge and Skills developed from their programmes, followed closely by Teacher-Student Relationships, Active Learning, and Relevance to Practice.
- Open-ended comments were visualised in comparison word clouds together with selected sample comments to show the keywords and ideas most often mentioned by students on “Best Aspects of Programme” and “Suggestions for Programme Improvement” (Figure 2). Taught postgraduates emphasised best aspects such as “teacher”, “knowledge”, “learn”, and “help”.
Detailed results at the institutional, Faculty and curriculum levels are available at the online Institutional Survey Reports System (ISRS). Faculties could generate survey reports at various levels and make comparisons across years. All academic and administrative staff with access rights can directly access the system after logging onto their HKU Portal accounts (HKU Portal > Self Service > Teaching and Learning > Institutional Survey Reports > View Reports). Detailed instructions on using the System are available in the User Manual, downloadable here.
Faculties are welcome to contact Dr. Maggie Zhao at myzhao@hku.hk for support in interpreting and utilising survey data, and Ms. Yvonne Chan at chanyyw@hku.hk for technical support in using ISRS.


2017-18
Highlights
- Overall performance on Achievement of Educational Aims, Teaching and Learning Environment, and Overall Satisfaction remained steady over the years (Figure 1).
- In 2017-18, taught postgraduate students gave the highest rating on Knowledge and Skills developed from their programmes, followed closely by Teacher-Student Relationships, Active Learning and Relevance to Practice.
- Open-ended comments were visualised in comparison word clouds to highlight the keywords most frequently used by students on “Best Aspects of Programme” and “Suggestions for Programme Improvement” (Figure 2). Taught postgraduate students emphasised best aspects such as “field trips”, “knowledge in the field” and “helpful teachers”.
Detailed results at the institutional, Faculty and curriculum levels are available at the online Institutional Survey Reports System (ISRS), which enables Faculties to generate survey reports at various levels and make comparisons across years. All academic staff and administrative staff with access rights can directly access the System after logging on to the HKU Portal account (HKU Portal > Self Service > Teaching and Learning > Institutional Survey Reports > View Reports). Detailed instructions on using the System are available in the User Manual, downloadable here.
Faculties are welcome to contact Dr. Maggie Zhao at myzhao@hku.hk for support in interpreting and utilising survey data, and Ms. Yvonne Chan at chanyyw@hku.hk for technical support in using ISRS.


2016-17
Highlights
- Overall performance on Achievement of Educational Aims, Teaching and Learning Environment, and Overall Satisfaction remained steady over the years, ranging from 3.87 to 4.04 in 2016-17 (Figure 1).
- In 2016-17, taught postgraduate students gave the highest rating on Knowledge and Skills developed from their programmes, followed by Active Learning, Relevance to Practice and Teacher-Student Relationships.
- Open-ended comments were visualised in comparison word clouds to highlight the keywords most frequently used by students on “Best Aspect(s) of Programme” and “Suggestion(s) for Programme Improvement” (Figure 2).
Detailed results at the institutional, Faculty and curriculum levels are available at the online Institutional Survey Reports System (ISRS), which enables Faculties to generate survey reports at various levels and make comparisons across years. All academic staff and administrative staff with access rights can directly access the System after logging on to the HKU Portal account (HKU Portal > Self Service > Teaching and Learning > Institutional Survey Reports > View Reports). Detailed instructions on using the System are available in the User Manual, downloadable here.
Faculties are welcome to contact Dr. Maggie Zhao at myzhao@hku.hk for support in interpreting and utilising survey data, and Ms. Yvonne Chan at chanyyw@hku.hk for technical support in using ISRS.

